🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.